Our Editorial Methodology
A transparent framework for product labels, human evidence, safety and claims.
1. Establish the product facts
We begin with recorded labels, manufacturer listings and visible seller policies. Historical labels are dated; currently shipped formulations and checkout terms require re-verification.
2. Sort sources by evidentiary strength
For clinical outcomes, randomized trials and systematic reviews are preferred to testimonials, marketing claims or laboratory-only findings. For prices and return terms, the relevant current checkout and seller documentation take priority.
3. Track evidence distance
An ingredient trial is not a finished-product trial. We assess species, route, dose, extract standardization, population, outcome and duration before discussing relevance.
4. Protect against fabricated authority
No fake doctors, patient counts, average ratings, personal testing claims or invented urgency. When facts are uncertain, we say so.
5. Recheck commercial facts
Pricing, packaging, shipping and refunds can change. Screenshots are identified by country and observation date. We do not portray historical prices as live quotes.
6. Correct errors
Where reliable contradictory sources emerge, the relevant passage should be revised with source context and a review date. The independent site’s editorial contact method is not yet configured; see contact status .